Tintri releases TGC 4. Legacy Performance Graphs in megabytes per second. Note that the percentages in bold above may change as more information continues to be collected and analyzed. We’ve been told to expect shipment into the channel before the close of the year. Let’s hope this prediction pans out! A standard five-year warranty backs the drive. Seagate followed with the Cheetah 10K.
|Date Added:||26 June 2015|
|File Size:||8.62 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Maxtor positions the Atlas 10K V to service traditional workhorse server applications where capacity and cost constraints rule out high-speed 15, RPM drives.
Things are a bit different maxotr year, however. Seeks, as one would expect, are rather audible given the Maxtor’s aggressive random access times. Service Time Graphs in milliseconds. Transfer Rate Graphs in megabytes per second.
Maxtor Atlas 10K III Internal Hard Drive (GB, Ultra SCSI Pin) Overview – CNET
The following results serve only as a reference; SR does not factor them into final judgments and recommends that readers do the same. 10l that while the measurement is an A-weighted decibel score that weighs frequencies in proportion to human ear sensitivity, a low score does not necessarily predict whether or not a drive will exhibit a high-pitch whine that some may find intrusive. Introduction Density increases have slowed down tremendously.
For more information click here.
Maxtor Atlas 10K V | – Storage Reviews
Seagate was always first in delivering next-generation product. Transfer Rate Graphs in megabytes per second. Maxtor Atlas 10k IV Capacities. Lord of Destruction v1.
Maxtor’s score of 8. Note that the percentages in bold above may change as more information continues to be collected and analyzed.
Heat and Noise Idle Noise – The sound pressure emitted from a drive measured at a distance of 18 millimeters. For more information click here. The High-End DriveMark includes significantly more sequential transfers and write as opposed to read operations.
Maxtor Atlas 10k V 3.5 Series 146gb Serial Attached SCSI Ultra 320
As one of a new breed of SCSI drives, the Atlas 10K V crams gigabytes of data onto a single two-sided platter that measures less than three inches in diameter. Care must be taken to integrate the disk in an environment with steady, free airflow. Substantially increased queue depths are a large side effect.
Subtracting 3 milliseconds to account for rotational latency yields an average measured seek time of 4. Next on the scene was Fujitsu’s MAP Multi-user performance has traditionally been a Fujitsu stronghold yet Maxtor’s newcomer manages to turn in the top scores here. IBM was the first to the plate with a “next generation” unit, though the Ultrastar Z10’s areal density doesn’t quite stack up with the competition. Bear in mind that improved bandwidth is only one of the benefits that Ultra delivers.
Non-localized access and high queue depths differentiate server-style disk access from even the most demanding of workstation loads. Windows XP’s boot procedure involves significantly different maaxtor patterns and queue depths than those found in other disk accesses.
Maxtor Atlas 10k IV
Though most ATA drives still register significantly quieter than the Atlas, it nonetheless follows the laudable trend of reduced noise. A proprietary analysis engine then processes the qualified dataset. The figure typically represents the lowest sustained transfer rate a drive delivers. Outer-zone tests yield sustained throughput of Let’s turn to some high-level tests to see how these impressive low-level translate into application performance.
Rates decay steadily but gradually across zones to eventually yield an inner-track score of Let’s see how high Maxtor sets the bar with the 10K V. Finally, Maxtor would deliver a drive that excelled in desktop performance while trailing Fujitsu’s disk in multi-user performance.